As an attendee of our upcoming conference, we want to provide you with insight into the abstract review process and introduce you to the individuals responsible for evaluating the submissions. This section serves as a behind-the-scenes glimpse into the meticulous process that shapes our conference program.
Name | Themes and Topics |
|---|---|
Dr T. Vijaya Lakshmi Associate Professor, Department of Computer Science, JNTU |
|
Dr T. Vijaya Lakshmi Associate Professor, Department of Computer Science, JNTU |
|
Dr T. Vijaya Lakshmi Associate Professor, Department of Computer Science, JNTU |
|
The abstract review process is a meticulous endeavor aimed at ensuring the quality and relevance of the presentations featured at our conference. Here's a brief overview of how it works:
Submitted abstracts and papers will undergo a rigorous peer-review process to ensure quality and relevance to the conference themes. The reviewers, who are fixed for each theme, are carefully assigned based on their expertise and knowledge within relevant subject areas.
Our expert reviewers will evaluate each submission based on criteria such as originality, clarity, and contribution to the field. They assess each abstract based on predefined criteria, including originality, significance, methodology, and clarity.
Authors will receive timely and constructive feedback via email. The feedback will be provided if the submitted abstract is suitable for a different category, if changes are needed, or if the submission did not follow the guidelines. This ensures an open and transparent review process, offering insights into the strengths of the work and areas for improvement.
Based on reviewer feedback, abstracts are either accepted for presentation, accepted with revisions, or declined. Authors will be notified of the acceptance or rejection of their submissions via email.
Accepted abstracts undergo finalization for inclusion in the conference program. It's important to note that the technical committee reserves the right to edit papers for publication purposes, ensuring consistency and adherence to publishing standards while preserving the integrity of the authors' work.